Recital 23

(23) The application of the principle of ‘do no significant harm’ within the meaning of Article 17 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council (11) (the principle of ‘do no significant harm’) is essential to ensure that the reforms and investments undertaken as part of the recovery from the COVID-19 crisis are implemented in a sustainable manner. It should continue to apply to the reforms and investments supported by the Facility, with one targeted exemption to safeguard the Union’s immediate energy security concerns. Considering the objective of diversifying energy supplies away from Russian suppliers, the reforms and investments set out in the REPowerEU chapters which are necessary to improve energy infrastructure and facilities to meet immediate security of supply needs for gas should be eligible for financial support under the Facility even if they do not comply with the principle of ‘do no significant harm’. As a rule, oil infrastructure and facilities are excluded from the REPowerEU chapter. By derogation, a Member State that has been subject to the exceptional temporary derogation in Article 3m(4) of Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 (12) until the entry into force of this amending Regulation, due to its specific dependence on crude oil and geographical situation, should be able to include in the REPowerEU chapter oil infrastructure and facilities necessary to meet immediate security of supply needs. The Commission should assess whether measures expected to address immediate security of energy supply needs are eligible for the derogation from the principle of ‘do no significant harm’. For the purpose of that assessment, the Commission should consider, among other conditions, the risk of lock-in effects and the unavailability of cleaner, technologically and economically feasible alternatives that could be deployed within a comparable timeline. Such assessment should be proportionate, taking into account the urgency of achieving the REPowerEU objectives. In case of doubts, the Commission should be able to request Member States to provide relevant information to support the assessment. The evaluation of cleaner alternatives should be performed within reasonable limits.

← Recital 22 · All articles · Recital 24 →

Source: EUR-Lex (Cellar) · retrieved 2026-10-13 · Text as adopted (Official Journal); later amendments are not incorporated in this text.