ntr318-C_2019323EN.01000401-E0318
COMMISSION NOTICE Guidance on the interpretation and application of Council Directive 93/13/EEC on unfair terms in consumer contracts · European Union
(318) In his opinion of 14 May 2019 in Case C-260/18 Dziubak, Advocate General Pitruzzella, considers that the notion of supplementary provision has to be interpreted narrowly in the sense that it only applies to provisions which can as such replace the unfair contract term, without requiring ‘creativity’ by the judge, given that such ‘creativity’ would, in his view, correspond to a revision of unfair contract terms (paragraphs 77-79).
Source: EUR-Lex (Cellar) · retrieved 2026-09-25 · Text as adopted (Official Journal); later amendments are not incorporated in this text.