sec_3_4_6__para__5
COMMISSION NOTICE Guidance on the interpretation and application of Council Directive 93/13/EEC on unfair terms in consumer contracts · European Union
The Court has indicated explicitly that, in relation to a choice-of-law clause that fails to acknowledge the fact that, under the Rome I Regulation consumers can always rely on the more advantageous rules of their Member State of residence (260), this omission of information or the misleading character of the term can imply its unfairness. The Court (261), after recalling the criterion of a significant imbalance in the rights and obligations of the parties, stated that
← sec_3_4_6__para__4 · All articles · doc__table__90 →
Source: EUR-Lex (Cellar) · retrieved 2026-09-25 · Text as adopted (Official Journal); later amendments are not incorporated in this text.