doc__table__142

1. HABITATS OF COMMUNITY INTEREST Habitats of Community interest (Annex I HD) concerned by the proposal: — ... — ... Possible loss of habitats of Community interest: — Habitat code: ... — repeat for each habitat involved | ☐ No | ☐ Yes ☐ Permanent ☐ Temporary Possible fragmentation of habitats of community interest: — Habitat code: ... — repeat for each habitat involved | ☐ No | ☐ Yes ☐ Permanent ☐ Temporary 2. SPECIES AND HABITAT OF SPECIES OF COMMUNITY INTEREST Species of Community interest (Annex II HD and Art.4 BD) concerned by the proposal: — ... — ... Possible disturbance of species of Community interest: — Species: … — repeat for each species involved | ☐ No | ☐ Yes ☐ Permanent ☐ Temporary Possible direct/indirect loss of species of Community interest (repeat for each species involved): — Species: … — Number of individuals, pairs,... from SDF | ☐ No | ☐ Yes Estimate (no. of individuals, pairs...) lost Possible loss/fragmentation of species’ habitats: — Species: … — Type of species’ habitat: … (repeat for each habitat of species involved) | ☐ No | ☐ Yes ☐ Permanent ☐ Temporary 3. CUMULATIVE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Can other P/P/I/A cause significant cumulative and/or synergetic effects on the Natura 2000 site concerned jointly with the proposal in question? ☐ Yes ☐ No If Yes, indicate which other P/P/I/A and describe how they will significantly affect the site, together with the proposal under consideration: ... 4. INDIRECT EFFECTS EVALUATION Can the proposal have indirect effects on the Natura 2000 site? ☐ Yes ☐ No If Yes, indicate which ones: ... 5. ASSESSMENT SYNTHESIS The P/P/P/I/A can cause direct, indirect, and/or cumulative effects, even potential, on habitats of community interest? ☐ Yes ☐ No If Yes, why: ... ... The P/P/P/I/A can cause direct, indirect, and/or cumulative effects, even potential, on species of community interest? ☐ Yes ☐ No If Yes, why: … … The P/P/P/I/A can cause direct, indirect, and/or cumulative, even potential, impacts on the integrity of the Natura 2000 site (s)? ☐ Yes ☐ No If Yes, why: … … … 6. CONCLUSION OF THE SCREENING Conclusions and motivations (reasoned opinion): … … … … 7. RESULT OF THE SCREENING: ☐ | Positive: No need for Appropriate Assessment | ☐ | Negative: Appropriate Assessment is required Source: Guidelines for evaluation of effects on Natura 2000 sites (Italy). Linee guida nazionali per la valutazione di incidenza (VInCA). Direttiva 92/43/CEE ‘Habitat’ art. 6, paragrafi 3 e 4. Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana, 2019.

← (TEIL DES VORABPRÜFUNGS-FORMATS IN DEN NATIONALEN LEITLINIEN ITALIENS) · All articles · 1.3. Verträglichkeitsprüfung eines nationalen Elektrizitätsprogramms in Irland – Prüfung kumulativer Auswirkungen →

Source: EUR-Lex (Cellar) · retrieved 2026-09-25 · Text as adopted (Official Journal); later amendments are not incorporated in this text.