doc__table__92

Assessment of alternative solutions The description and objectives of the plan or project | The ‘do nothing’ scenario Predicted adverse effects of the plan or project on the Natura 2000 site based on the appropriate assessment Comparison with plan or project Possible alternative solutions | Evidence of how the alternative solutions were assessed | Describe the relative effects on the conservation objectives of Natura 2000 (greater or less adverse effects) Alternative locations/routes Alternative 1 | | Alternative 2 | | Alternative 3 | | Alternative size and scale Alternative 1 | | Alternative 2 | | Alternative 3 | | Alternative means of meeting objectives (e.g. demand management) Alternative 1 | | Alternative 2 | | Alternative 3 | | | Comparison with plan or project (cont.) | Possible alternative solutions | Evidence of how the alternative solutions were assessed | Describe the relative effects on the conservation objectives of Natura 2000 (greater or less adverse effects) | Alternative methods (construction, operational, decommissioning) | Alternative 1 | | Alternative 2 | | Alternative 3 | | | Alternative timescales | Alternative 1 | | Alternative 2 | | Alternative 3 | | Conclusions on assessment of alternatives

← d1e3948-1-1__para__9 · All articles · d1e3948-1-1__para__10 →

Source: EUR-Lex (Cellar) · retrieved 2026-09-25 · Text as adopted (Official Journal); later amendments are not incorporated in this text.