sec_1_2__para__4

In C-922/19 Stichting Waternet (14) , the Court dealt with the question whether the continued supply of water to a dwelling in the case of change of occupancy without the new occupant’s express request constitutes ‘inertia selling’ in the meaning of point 29 of the UCPD Annex I (‘blacklist’), resulting in a right for the consumer not to pay for such supply in accordance with Article 27 of the CRD. The case required, inter alia, a determination whether a contract may be regarded as concluded between a water supply company and a consumer, in the absence of that consumer’s express consent.

← sec_1_2__para__3 · All articles · sec_1_2__para__5 →

Source: EUR-Lex (Cellar) · retrieved 2026-09-25 · Text as adopted (Official Journal); later amendments are not incorporated in this text.