sec_5_11_2__para__6 — COMMISSION NOTICE Guidance on the interpretation and application of Directive…

sec_5_11_2para6

COMMISSION NOTICE Guidance on the interpretation and application of Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on consumer rights · European Union

Furthermore, the exception does not apply to service contracts leading to tangible outcomes. In case C-208/19 NK (Individual house project) the Court held that the contract between an architect and a consumer, according to which the former is required to prepare the designs for the construction of a new building, cannot be regarded as falling under Article 16(c) CRD. Although the designs could be provided in tangible form (on paper or digital), the subject matter of the contract is an intellectual service – architectural design, and the subsequent delivery has only ancillary function (139).

← — · All articles · sec_5_11_2__para__7 →

Source: EUR-Lex (Cellar) · retrieved 2026-09-25 · Text as adopted (Official Journal); later amendments are not incorporated in this text.