ntr63-C_202505519EN.000101-E0063
(63) Munn, L. (2020). Angry by design: Toxic communication and technical architectures. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7(53). Available: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00550-7; Milli, S. et al. (2025). Engagement, user satisfaction, and the amplification of divisive content on social media. PNAS Nexus, 4(3) pgaf062. Available: https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf062; Piccardi, T. et al. (2024). Social Media Algorithms Can Shape Affective Polarization via Exposure to Antidemocratic Attitudes and Partisan Animosity. Available: 10.48550/arXiv.2411.14652; Harriger, J. A., Evans, J. L., Thompson, J. K., & Tylka, T. L. (2022). The dangers of the rabbit hole: Reflections on social media as a portal into a distorted world of edited bodies and eating disorder risk and the role of algorithms. Body Image, 41, 292-297. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2022.03.007; Amnesty International. (2023). Driven into darkness: How TikTok’s ‘For You’ feed encourages self-harm and suicidal ideation. Available: https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/pol40/7350/2023/en/; Hilbert, M., Ahmed, S., Cho, J., & Chen, Y. (2024). #BigTech @Minors: Social media algorithms quickly personalize minors’ content, lacking equally quick protection. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4674573. Sala, A., Porcaro, L., Gómez, E. (2024). Social Media Use and adolescents' mental health and well-being: An umbrella review, Computers in Human Behavior Reports, Volume 14, 100404, ISSN 2451-9588. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100404.
Source: EUR-Lex (Cellar) · retrieved 2026-09-25 · Text as adopted (Official Journal); later amendments are not incorporated in this text.